Writer’s Choice

EVAUATION OF YOUR ESSAY

Your paper will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:

• Presentation of your ideas (e.g., writing style, organization, clarity of exposition)
• Strength of your arguments and analyses
• Creativity in dealing with the problems or issues being addressed
• Plausibility of the views or positions you defend
• Overall understanding of the issues you are discussing

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS AND ADVICE

Before Writing

One of the keys to writing a good paper is to be clear about what you want to say. You should, therefore, try to get as clear as you can about your topic before you start writing. Your views might evolve as you go along – that is to be expected – but, if you don’t have some objectives in mind before starting to write, you will have nothing to give you direction.

You should definitely make an outline of your essay, and you should plan on writing several drafts. You cannot expect to write a good paper in one draft. You may discuss your topic with other students in the class, as this is often a very helpful and enjoyable way to develop ideas. In the end, of course, you must write your paper yourself.

Points of Style

Remember that you are writing an essay and so, obviously, you must write in complete sentences with appropriate paragraph breaks, and so forth. Other than this, there is no special format that you need to use. It sometimes helps the reader to follow what’s being said if an essay is divided into different sections with appropriate headings and sub-headings. This is up to you, though there shouldn’t be too many headings, otherwise your paper will appear too fragmented.

You may use a somewhat informal writing style if you wish. For example, use of the first person is acceptable, as in “My own view is ..” or “I am inclined to think that …” However, be careful not to overwork such phrases, and avoid being too colloquial. It is best to write in a clear, straightforward style. Don’t try to sound too intellectual or academic, especially if you don’t feel comfortable or natural writing in such a style.
Organization

It is probably best to start your essay by stating as clearly as you can what issue you are going to be discussing. You may have to provide some background before you begin to develop your own ideas, and you may also need to clarify the question you are addressing, but you should do this as concisely as you can so that the bulk of the essay consists of your critical discussion of the issue.

Comments about Content

Remember that this is primarily a discussion paper, not a research paper. You may consult library or Internet sources for additional information about your topic, but this is not mainly what we are looking for. In writing your essay your main goal should be to say something interesting about the topic you have selected. To say something interesting about it, you must say something that is original and creative. This is another reason why you must think carefully about your topic before you begin writing, as you must determine whether you have any interesting things to say about it. If you can’t seem to come up with anything, switch to another topic.

Originality

Keep in mind that the purpose of writing a term paper, or writing anything for that matter, is to say something original. Your main goal in your paper must therefore be to say something new, or something that, as far as you are aware, is new and interesting about the issue of the meaning of life. You don’t want to merely repeat what others have written about this issue. Saying some new about an issue that is also plausible, whether in philosophy or any other subject is difficult, but do the best you can.

Give Arguments

Remember also that this is a philosophical paper, not an exercise in rhetoric. It is not enough merely to express your opinion, regardless of how elegantly you do so. I want you to be as forceful and persuasive as you can be, of course, but you must not engage in overstatement or exaggeration. To be persuasive in writing a philosophical paper means supporting your views by carefully reasoned and detailed arguments.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Philosophy reading and 3 reflection questions

Reflection Assignment Instructions:

In a written reflection of at least 200 words, engage with Stephen Wood, “Sports Team Owners Are Running Game on Players” (available as a PDF).

Your reflection must employ at least one (1) type of reflection task from three (3) different groups from the list of six groups (A) through (F) below. You are not limited to 3 tasks, but you must do at least 3 different tasks. There is no also minimum length for each individual task, only for the reflection as a whole.

Please use separate paragraphs for each reflection task and label each paragraph with the specific type of reflection task you’re completing within each group, not just the letter for the category. (You won’t get credit if you don’t include this! The purpose of this is to clearly communicate to me what you’re trying to do, and where in your response you’re trying to do it.)

Finally, you should state how long it took you to do the reading itself as well as how long your reflection took. (This is to help you be honest with yourself; you aren’t graded on the amount of time you spent, so there’s no incentive to lie or exaggerate, but you can’t get credit for the assignment if you don’t report this.)

Modes of Engagement:

Group A: Comprehension

Locating the author’s thesis or main idea and putting it in your own words
Be careful not to pick just any old sentence—your task is to zero in on the single most important idea the author is arguing for. The author will sometimes help you find this idea with phrases like ‘I am arguing that…’ or ‘I conclude that…’, but you may have to read between the lines. Once you’ve located the main idea, explain it as clearly as possible in your own words.
Outlining or summarizing the author’s argument in your own words
The most common way that philosophers do this is by setting out a list of formal numbered premises, or supporting claims, clearly explain how each the supporting claims build up to the conclusion.
Note: If the author has already clearly laid out a list of numbered premises, this reading is not a good candidate for outlining the argument, and you won’t get credit for it!
Group B: Queries

Identifying missing background information, doing some research, and then saying what you learned
Note: “Background” information, by definition, is not information contained in the essay itself (though it might be contained in another reading, a dictionary, an encyclopedia, etc.).
Asking a question and then following up on that question
This could be a clarification question about something that you found unclear or in need of further explanation
Once you’ve laid out your question, you should do some reflection(or research) and then make an educated guess as to what you think the most likely interpretation, explanation, etc. would be (even if you aren’t sure)
This could also be a curiosity question about a specific topic that the reading prompted you to want to learn more about
For curiosity questions, you should then do some research and report back what you learned and if your question got answered
Group C: Connections

Making connections between what you’re reading and what you already know
Try to draw clear and direct connections, explaining how this reading relates to another reading, an idea we discussed in class, something you learned in another class, your life experience, a novel, a TV show, etc.—as long as it’s directly relevant to the reading!
Applying concepts or theories to new contexts
Feel free to expand on an author’s idea and apply it to something new, such as coming up with a new thought experiment or analogy that creatively modifies or goes beyond what’s in the reading while showing your understanding of one of the author’s main ideas or concepts
Group D: Criticism

Constructively criticizing the author’s argument
There are two main ways to criticize an argument:
First, you can ask if one or more of the premises false? (In logical terms, Is the argument sound?)
Can you find (or imagine) a counterexample to one of the author’s central claims? This can take the form of either evidence or a thought experiment that shows one of the author’s claims to be false.
Second, you can ask if the premises fail to support the conclusion? (That is, Is the argument valid?) If we assume, for the sake of argument that the premises are all true, does the conclusion follow?
Note: An argument can have false premises and still be valid!
For any criticisms or objections you’ve raised, you should consider how the author might reply:
Could the author modify their view to avoid the objection you’ve raised while still preserving their basic conclusion? Or is the author forced to abandon their conclusion entirely?
Group E: Epiphanies

Describe something that you changed your mind about while reading
Be sure to describe both what it was that changed your mind (e.g., an analogy, a piece of evidence, etc.) and how it changed.
Describe a realization you had while reading the text
What is an idea you encountered that you hadn’t thought of before, but that seemed both surprising and also obvious once you understood it? Be sure to describe both the realization you had and what brought it about.
Group F: Other

Engage with the text in some other creative way not listed above, as long as it is done in a constructive manner that displays engagement with and mastery of the relevant content. Ideas along these lines include:
Creating a meme or or a TikTok or drawing a picture that that illustrates or displays a clear understanding of a key aspect of the argument
Paraphrasing a key passage or main idea in another writing style (e.g., as a tweet or as a sonnet or as parody song lyrics)
Offering your own original argument, with premises and conclusions clearly identified, in a way that directly engages with the reading or the topic being discussed

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Synthesis Paper

The attached file contains a 2000 word paper. Please edit the 800 words highlighted in yellow and integrate them into the remaining 2000 words. Please let me know if you have any questions

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Philosophy Question

This is a philosophy paper needs 1500 words. We must use the structure given.(In the doc file, very detailed.)
Instruction and structure are in the first attachment.
There are two prompt, choose one. (I provided three readings depending on which prompt you chose).
Thank you. Please please save my grade because my previous paper all got C..

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Thomas Hobbes

Textbook Link: https://we.tl/t-TMPi99ybxbInstructions:Please write a 1-2 page essay answering all parts of the following question. Feel free to use material and ideas from throughout Chapter 8. However, if you choose to use any direct quotes from the chapter, or any other outside sources, then please remember to properly cite that material using MLA format. The use of any outside material without citation will be considered plagiarism and will result in a 0 for the assignment.
Prompt:According to Thomas Hobbes, all individuals are self-interested and competitive. Given this assessment of human nature, what does Hobbes think a state without government, or a state of nature, would be like? How can we get out of this state of nature according to Hobbes? Do you think that Hobbes is correct in his account of the origins of government?

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Writer’s Choice

clearly connect a theme or author from class to a present day “artifact”.
two-page, double-spaced, explanation of the artifacts’s connection to the course theme or author.
12-point Times New Roman
Header section:
Nichole Guttery
Phil-1301
Chicago style formatting (for citations)
Topic choices: Ring of Gyges, Divided Line, or Plato’s republic-The guardians or aux.’s

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Philosophy Question

Explain how the Yin-Yang way of thinking (the Yin-Yang model of how to look at contraries) together with the Hegelian model can help you look at distinct approaches to either one issue in your own area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

ethics disscussion

Initial Post Instructions
In week three, we were looking at rights ethics with regards to Locke. As a reminder, Locke said we have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. It is immoral to violate them. Many think we have more rights than those listed by Locke. Some even think we have a right to health care. That means it is the duty of the state to provide each citizen with their medical needs.
Rights theory says to respect the entitlements we have. If a right is inalienable, it cannot truly be violated ethically even with our consent. We have basic needs. Rights are something beyond needs. They are what we should be authorized to have. We are due what we have a right to. That is not always the case with need. For example, we need food, but people often go hungry. A need refers to something we need physically to exist. A right is a moral entitlement to something. Asking if we have a right to food is a moral question. Needs are determined by the requirements of the body and of material existence. Rights are determined by moral reflection, inquiry, an argument We have a right to own property. We do not need it to live. We could imaginably be allowed to use another’s. We have a right to own a home. We can rent.
Initial Post InstructionsFor the initial post, respond to one of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating either Option 1 or Option 2:
Option 1: Assess the moral solutions arrived at through “care” (care-based ethics) and “rights” ethics to social issues of ethical import such as poverty, drug use, and/or lack of health care,
That is, note any ethical problems that arise related to those particular issues. Then, say how both care-based and rights theory of ethics would solve those problems.
Are those solutions correct? Why or why not?
What is your own approach there?
Option 2: What moral guidelines should we use when it comes to recently introduced healthcare technologies of any kind (you will note and engage with your own examples) and social technologies of any kind (you will note and engage with your own examples)?
Involve care-based ethics in your answer
apa cited resource

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Simple Journal Response

Journal response based on the instructions provided below. I also included the textbook pages for reference

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer

Environmental ethic philosophy

One summery and two Philosophical Discussion Points of pages 1-102. After each sentence you have to write the page number. For example: sentence ( page number). The summery should include all main points in the reading. The discussion points are philosophical—they illustrate whether you think the theorist is right or wrong and give reasons as to why. I will send the pages and more helpful information later.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS


Order your custom answer